Claimant also now expressly disclaims which the assessment of Yukos’ taxes, which showcased so prominently in its prior submissions, constituted functions of expropriation. Query 3.seven 212. Regarding the Participation Agreements, exactly what is the relevance of The big apple law since the governing legislation, of Russian regulation and of

3rd, the damages Claimant seeks are based upon an analysis at odds with the statements in Claimant’s Reply that Yukos' tax assessments were not themselves expropriatory steps. Because the supplemental expert report of Professor James Dow demonstrates, LECG’s calculation of damages, on which Claimant depends, is based on a similar "retroactive"